Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2012 September 21
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
September 21
[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as F8 by RHaworth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 14:09, 21 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Roza Shanina's diary.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- see commons:Commons:Deletion requests/File:Roza Shanina's diary.jpg; I'm unclear if Russia had wartime extensions in place or not in 1996; if so, then it is unfree in the US until 2061. Magog the Ogre (t • c) 01:41, 21 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 13:09, 29 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Baton.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).
- File:Bestpeer.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Both of these images are tagged {{PD-self}} and uploaded by the same user, but the file description pages say that the author of the first image is Quang Hieu Vu and the author of the second is Linhao Xu. —Bkell (talk) 07:21, 21 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as F11 by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 29 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- According to their website BGS Materials are 'non-commercial' use only. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:12, 21 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as F9 by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 14:09, 21 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Photo of Saina Nehwal.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license. Mspraveen (talk) 12:32, 21 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 20:10, 1 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- This is a logo produced by someone other than the uploader of the photo.
Acceptable as fair use Sfan00 IMG (talk) 13:11, 21 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The shield logo is taken from the medieval coat of arms of the Cokayne family. I believed the use of this is exempt from copyright under Article 6 'quinquies' B(II) of the Paris Convention 1979. If the infringement is considered in reference to the ball itself then this was made and painted by John Harrison of Ashbourne. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Adrian Roebuck (talk • contribs) 06:25, 25 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 13:09, 29 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Kate Gleason.tif (delete | talk | history | logs).
- "Original publication: unknown" and "not from a published source" may suggest that this is an unpublished photo. If so, the copyright expires 70 years after the death of the photographer or 120 years after the photo was taken. Even if published during the lifetime of the subject of the photo, it might still be copyrighted as the person died in 1933. No evidence that the photo is in the public domain. Stefan2 (talk) 17:37, 21 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 13:09, 29 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Caleb bragg 1914.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Insufficiently sourced: source only given as a three-letter abbreviation ("LOC"). No evidence of publication. A search for "Caleb Bragg" at the "www.three-letter abbreviation.gov" website doesn't bring up any information about this photo. Stefan2 (talk) 17:54, 21 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete. Boldly F7'd following discussion at WT:CP. Dpmuk (talk) 18:52, 21 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- This file consists of 6 scanned pages of a non-free book. Its only use was on a page that already quoted and cited the same book. Theodore Kloba (talk) 18:25, 21 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 20:10, 1 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Sketch of Gef.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Text for image says "Says the image can be used ONLY on wiki projects." Eeekster (talk) 19:46, 21 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- See also Commons:COM:HD#Trouble Uploading. --Stefan2 (talk) 19:57, 21 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 13:09, 29 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Sugato Chakravarty.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Appears to be a professional portrait. No evidence for copyright being owned by uploader. Eeekster (talk) 19:49, 21 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 20:10, 1 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- See reasoning: Flickrwashing. Leyo 21:26, 21 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment 87517543@N08 does not appear at Commons:User:FlickreviewR/bad-authors. It should be added there.
- F9 The file appeared here in 2004, but wasn't uploaded to Flickr until yesterday.[1] --Stefan2 (talk) 21:33, 21 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.