Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ansu Kabia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Minimal participation and no agreement after two relists. RL0919 (talk) 19:03, 24 December 2022 (UTC)

Ansu Kabia

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

Ansu Kabia (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NACTOR. Bit-part actor. Fails WP:SIGCOV. scope_creep^Talk 16:39, 3 December 2022 (UTC)

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers and United Kingdom. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 17:19, 3 December 2022 (UTC)

  Hello - I recommend keeping this article as this actor has an important history in both live performance as well as popular culture movies and television performances. He is one of the lead characters in a current television series - in its third year. How is this article different in substance from another lead performer on the same popular UK series? Please see: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stuart_Martin

  Additionally, I recommend keeping this article to help broaden information on performers of color on Wikipedia. Thank you. Nicolet1327 (talk) 14:07, 9 December 2022 (UTC)

@Nicolet1327: Its the lack of coverage per WP:SIGCOV and WP:NACTOR was the reason I posted it to Afd. I did see him in Netflix advert just this second, so you provide WP:THREE sources that show he is notable, I will withdraw the nomination. Hope that helps. scope_creep^Talk 19:08, 9 December 2022 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Star Mississippi 15:07, 10 December 2022 (UTC)

• Weak keep. Probably has enough noteworthy acting credits to meet WP:NOTABILITY. And there are plenty of sources listing his acting credits to meet WP:SIGCOV. I'm tempted to say that this feels like an odd case because there isn't really much to report except his acting credits (if there were more to report, such as from an interview, the subject would more obviously meet the relevant guidelines). In other words, it feels atypical, but probably just about worth keeping. The article needs some cleanup though as I think the sentences introducing credits are superfluous/not standard; ditto for some of the 'notes'. MB190417 (talk) 02:11, 11 December 2022 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, – filelakeshoe (t / c) 🐱 16:28, 17 December 2022 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.