Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Bk2006/Archive

Bk2006

Bk2006 (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)

21 July 2018

Suspected sockpuppets

PAKHIGHWAY (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)

Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

PAKHIGHWAY has often said that he has edited Wikipedia before "for many years",[1] sometimes dating his activity as far as 2008.[2] For obvious reasons he won't say that he had other accounts.

Bk2006 created Lahore Area Control Center,[3] and PAKHIGHWAY created Lahore Area Control Centre.[4]

Bk2006 created Karachi Area Control Center,[5] and PAKHIGHWAY created Karachi Area Control Centre.[6]

On Khyber Medical College, Bk2006 added {{Khyber Medical University}}[7] and PAKHIGHWAY added Category:Khyber Medical University.[8]

Addition of "National Highway 35" on Karakoram Highway.[9][10]

Censoring "Indian subcontinent" on Indus Valley Civilisation.[11][12]

Same controversial template addition of {{Music of Pakistan}} on Music of Kashmir, Jammu and Ladakh.[13][14]

Addition of "Overseas Pakistani" on Pakistani Americans.[15][16][17]

PAKHIGHWAY and Bk2006 have restored the section about list of "Artists" on Pakistani hip hop.[18][19]

Bk2006 added "{{Neighbourhoods in Lahore}}" on Iqbal Town, Lahore,[20] and PAKHIHWAY restored that article adding "{{Neighbourhoods in Lahore}}" back.[21]

Both considers Model Town, Lahore to be a neighborhood:[22][23]

Special emphasis towards "Pakistani American" on Bohemia (rapper).[24] [25]

PAKHIGHWAY: ""Indian subcontinent" is commonly used by Indian wiki contributors, even though the region is now referred to as South Asia."[26]

Bk2006's IP (per last block entry): "The term "Indian Subcontinent" is always thrown into every Pakistani article by indian members, talk about insecurity."[27]

Same modus operandi:

Bk2006:

"Nothing more sad than seeing loser indians put the word india everywhere on WP. fuck u" [28]

"Deleting the Pakistani tab won't make this Pakistani genre any more "indian"...you monkeys disgust me."[29]

PAKHIGHWAY:

"Stop shoving "indian" into everything."[30]

"Never ceases to amaze me how moronic most Indians are."[31] Capitals00 (talk) 13:38, 21 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Bbb23: What do you mean? This report was filed after admin Yamla allowed to do so.[32] Bk2006 is the actual sockmaster, not PAKHIGHWAY. I think you should allow clerks to merge the SPI and tag Bk2006 as the actual sockmaster. Capitals00 (talk) 14:42, 21 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note that Bbb23 is probably saying there's no longer any technical evidence sufficient for an investigation here. Sorry, I thought this would be worth filing just to identify the original account, but it looks like Bbb23 disagrees. No harm done. --Yamla (talk) 15:00, 21 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

That's why the request was not marked as "|checkuser=no". @Bbb23: It had been less than an hour when you closed it. The purpose of the SPI is about identifying the original sock master which is Bk2006. Closing without action can be also interpreted as acquittal that Bk2006 and PAKHIGHWAY have no connection. If clerks find above evidence convincing then Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/PAKHIGHWAY can be merged here and Bk2006 should be treated as the master, and any unblock requests should be made from Bk2006, not PAKHIGHWAY, since Bk2006 is the oldest account and any more socks of this accounts can be also compared with Bk2006 during behavioral analysis. Capitals00 (talk) 15:21, 21 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

This is a waste of time. Closing. Bbb23 (talk) 14:27, 21 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Capitals00: Before I closed this report, I read the discussion on Yamla's Talk page. There is no merger here. To have a merger, you have to have another case. Here the only interest is establishing behaviorally that there is an earlier account than PAKHIGHWAY. I see no purpose in clerks wasting their time doing that analysis.--Bbb23 (talk) 15:03, 21 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]