User talk:Matrix
 | This user talk page may contain one or more inaccuracies or does not cite all of its sources. [citation needed] The author(s) must promptly be executed. [Citation not needed at all; thank you very much] Wikipedia contains no inaccuracies. [citation needed] This template may also be inaccurate. [Citation not needed at all; thank you very much][Citation not needed at all; thank you very much][Citation not needed at all; thank you very much] |
 | This user is busy in real life and may not respond swiftly to queries, however, they will try to never let you down. |
| This is Matrix's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments. |
|
Archives: Index, 1, 2Auto-archiving period: 3 months  |
Colors
[edit]Heya! A couple months ago, you made this change to {{unblock reviewed}}. Your comment had to do with "dark mode compatibility", but the result for "unblock reviewed" when "accept" is set is an odd seafoam color #DFF2EB that doesn't seem to fit with anything. (It's a lovely color, certainly.) Where's it come from? --jpgordon𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇 04:28, 12 January 2025 (UTC)
- @Jpgordon: it comes from the Wikimedia Codex guide, search for
background-color-success-subtlein [1]. It seems to fit in well as a pastel green per this example, but if you can specify why you don't like it I would be happy to hear. —Matrix(!) ping onewhen replying {u - t? -uselessc} 11:57, 12 January 2025 (UTC)- I don't dislike it, it just puzzled me. --jpgordon𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇 15:28, 12 January 2025 (UTC)
- Fair enough —Matrix(!) ping onewhen replying {u - t? -
uselessc} 16:59, 12 January 2025 (UTC)
- Fair enough —Matrix(!) ping onewhen replying {u - t? -
- I don't dislike it, it just puzzled me. --jpgordon𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇 15:28, 12 January 2025 (UTC)
light-dark
[edit]Hey, I saw you mentioning light-dark in a thread, but as I got an idea just after it being archived, I'm bringing this to you here.
We can get great compatibility with light-dark by using a fallback:
background-color: white; /* fallback to get 100% browser compatibility */
background-color: light-dark(white, black); /* will overwrite the first and be applied if the browser has support */
So, without the comments:
background-color:white; background-color:light-dark(white,black);
As dark mode users usually don't use older browsers, this should work for most of them, and it is quick and easy to implement! :) Arthurfragoso (talk) 16:10, 28 January 2025 (UTC)
- @Arthurfragoso: This isn't quite compatible. MediaWiki has the highest level of compatibility with versions of Chrome, FF, and Edge from 2022 and Safari from 2018. Thats not even getting into mobile browsers. light-dark() css browser compatibility is not that good, with most browsers only supporting from 2024+. We could revisit this in 3-4 years though. —Matrix(!) ping onewhen replying {u - t? -
uselessc} 21:50, 28 January 2025 (UTC)- I'm not sure if you understood that I said to use light-dark along with the fallback, and not using light-dark alone.
- We can check statistical coverage at caniuse.
- But I'd say to use in that way only in Templates that doesn't already contain a stylesheet page.
- -- Arthurfragoso (talk) 22:19, 28 January 2025 (UTC)
- @Arthurfragoso: I understood. The problem is there are many browser versions that support MediaWiki dark mode but don't support light-dark(), so this wouldn't work. —Matrix(!) ping onewhen replying {u - t? -
uselessc} 18:54, 29 January 2025 (UTC)
- @Arthurfragoso: I understood. The problem is there are many browser versions that support MediaWiki dark mode but don't support light-dark(), so this wouldn't work. —Matrix(!) ping onewhen replying {u - t? -
Concern regarding Draft:List of Tramlink stops
[edit]
Hello, Matrix. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:List of Tramlink stops, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:07, 10 February 2025 (UTC)
Your draft article, Draft:List of Tramlink stops
[edit]
Hello, Matrix. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "List of Tramlink stops".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! DreamRimmer bot II (talk) 16:24, 10 March 2025 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:WPS Office Screenshot 2022.png
[edit]
Thanks for uploading File:WPS Office Screenshot 2022.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:36, 5 April 2025 (UTC)
