Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Drinking and Driving Wrecks Lives

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) —Nnadigoodluck🇳🇬 01:43, 11 August 2020 (UTC)

Drinking and Driving Wrecks Lives

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

Drinking and Driving Wrecks Lives (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non notable film with no independent, verifiable reviews found during search. Donaldd23 (talk) 01:42, 4 August 2020 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Donaldd23 (talk) 01:42, 4 August 2020 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Donaldd23 (talk) 01:42, 4 August 2020 (UTC)

• Merge and redirect into Public information film, where it's already mentioned. --Lockley (talk) 00:50, 8 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Keep after good discussion below. --Lockley (talk) 20:58, 8 August 2020 (UTC)
• Keep A seminal and hugely important piece of UK government education in the 1980s and 1990s, that happened to hit me growing up at exactly the right moment, being just old enough to drink or to drive when the In the Summertime campaign came out in 1992. I have expanded the article using various sources. Ritchie333 ^{(talk) (cont)} 16:15, 8 August 2020 (UTC)
• Keep as obviously notable to anyone in the UK old enough to have seen this campaign. I had this on my to-do list to improve, but can now get back to the snooker (now that the cricket test match has finished) thanks to User:Ritchie333, who appears to be a bit younger than me. This shouldn't be judged as a film, but as a campaign. Phil Bridger (talk) 18:02, 8 August 2020 (UTC)
• Keep. I added book coverage including an award, and a description of the 'Eyes' advert. I also found another book covering the campaigns, Bennett and Calman, Risk Communication and Public Health, but because I can see that only in snippet view, didn't use it; what I was looking for was independent referencing of the complaints about 'Dave' that apparently led to its being taken off-air. In any event, these spots have received continuing coverage in both news and non-news reliable sources and thus meet GNG. Yngvadottir (talk) 18:31, 8 August 2020 (UTC)
• Keep as WP:HEY the article has been considerably improved since nomination with the addition of references to significant coverage in multiple reliable sources so that deletion is no longer necessary, imv Atlantic306 (talk) 21:09, 9 August 2020 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.