Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alternative Insubric orthographies
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Salvio giuliano 12:28, 20 March 2023 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Alternative Insubric orthographies (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
No refs on the page for many years. I don't see sources that verify the information on the page, but am happy if others can find something. If the information could be verified, as an AtD perhaps the content could be merged to Western Lombard dialect JMWt (talk) 11:49, 13 March 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Language and Italy. JMWt (talk) 11:49, 13 March 2023 (UTC)
- Delete: not sufficient sourcing Justwatchmee (talk) 23:36, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
- Delete nothing found in Gscholar or Jstor, which is where I assume you would find linguistic items. Oaktree b (talk) 14:28, 13 March 2023 (UTC)
- Delete - if no sign of sources (and the article has certainly had time for them to be found) then deletion is the right option: this certainly has the look of original research. Chiswick Chap (talk) 16:44, 13 March 2023 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.